By Connor Spicer
One of the most significant structural developments in large law firms over the past decade has been the expansion of the non-equity partner tier. Many firms now operate two-tier partnerships, where some lawyers hold the title of partner without sharing in firm ownership.
The Rise of the Salaried Partner
Partnership once implied ownership. Lawyers who made partner joined the firm’s equity structure, sharing both profits and risk. That model has changed. Across major US and international firms, the number of non-equity, or salaried, partners has grown steadily. In many cases, recent increases in partner numbers have occurred primarily within this tier rather than among equity partners.
The typical career progression now often follows:
- Associate
- Counsel or senior associate
- Non equity partner
- Equity partner
This structure enables firms to recognize senior lawyers with promotion while maintaining a relatively small equity group.
The Economics Behind the Shift
The growth of the non-equity tier is closely tied to law firm economics. A key benchmark for large firms is profit per equity partner (PEP), which influences rankings, recruitment, and overall market perception. Expanding the non-equity tier allows firms to manage this figure more effectively.
Non-equity partners often generate substantial revenue, manage client relationships, and lead teams, yet they do not share in the equity pool. This allows firms to increase senior capacity without diluting profits among equity partners.
Some firms have also reduced their equity ranks through de-equitization to further support profitability metrics.
Recruitment and Retention
The model also plays a role in attracting and retaining talent. Firms need ways to keep experienced lawyers who might otherwise move to competitors or in-house roles. Promotion to non-equity partner provides recognition and status without requiring expansion of the ownership group.
For lawyers, this step typically brings greater professional standing, higher compensation, and the credibility associated with the partner title. However, the title no longer necessarily signals ownership or influence over firm strategy.
A Changing Career Path
The expansion of the non-equity tier has prompted discussion within the profession.
Some suggest it may create a more defined intermediate level within partnerships. Lawyers in these roles may hold the partner title, generate significant revenue, and manage teams, yet not always progress to equity status.
In some firms, non-equity partners now outnumber equity partners by a considerable margin, raising questions about how many will ultimately reach the equity tier.
For some, the role serves as a stepping stone. For others, it may represent a longer-term position without ownership.
Cultural Implications
The two-tier structure also affects internal dynamics.
Traditional partnerships were built on shared ownership and collective responsibility. A larger salaried tier introduces clearer distinctions within the partnership.
Some suggest this may lead to a more defined hierarchy between partner groups, differing financial incentives, and reduced involvement in governance among salaried partners. Others view it as a practical response to the scale and complexity of modern firms.
Alternative Models
Not all firms have adopted this approach. Some continue to operate single-tier partnerships, arguing that shared ownership fosters collaboration and long-term commitment. These firms often maintain smaller partnerships, stricter promotion criteria, and traditional compensation systems. However, competitive pressures around profitability and recruitment have led many firms toward two-tier structures.
Contact Us
connor.spicer@wearebuchanan.com